Elon Musk and the Criticism of the WNBA Star: Left Manipulation and Establishment Propaganda

Elon Musk has been at the centre of growing hostility from the left, a phenomenon that has increased considerably in recent months. Recently, Musk was the subject of a surprising criticism from Natasha Cloud, a WNBA star for the Phoenix Mercury, who posted a message on social media platform X that left many speechless. Cloud’s statement, which called for Elon Musk to “go back to Africa”, reflects the political polarisation and media manipulation that has characterised the narrative about the South African billionaire in left-dominated media.

Cloud, 32, posted on X: “When are they going to tell Elon to go back to Africa?”, referring to Musk, who was famously born in Pretoria, South Africa. This comment is not only a personal attack on Musk, but also a manifestation of the aggressive and uninformed tone that characterizes the discourse of the business figure’s detractors. Rather than focusing on Musk’s facts or actions, Cloud chose to launch a racial attack at a time when criticism of Musk has become a recurring theme within progressive circles.

Cloud’s post was followed by another comment that called into question Musk’s understanding of the US political system. In reference to Musk’s recent intervention to stop a mammoth spending bill in the House of Representatives, Cloud wrote, “I’m glad ALL these billionaires have no idea how the 3 branches of government work… or how a bill gets passed.” This comment not only reflects a lack of understanding about the legislative process, but also a lack of appreciation for the role Musk played in fighting a bill that many view as filled with unnecessary spending.

Musk’s intervention, along with former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, was crucial in stopping a bill that exceeded 1,500 pages and contained large amounts of unnecessary spending. Musk led a public campaign against the bill and suggested that House members who voted for it should face political consequences in future elections. His involvement was instrumental in reducing the size of the bill, allowing for a more limited version that ultimately passed the House.

However, Cloud’s criticism of Musk did not focus on the details of the bill or its problematic content. Instead, he attacked Musk for his involvement in the fight against government spending, showing a clear disconnect between real issues and the propaganda circulating in left-wing media. This disconnect is a reflection of how narratives constructed by media outlets and progressive elites can influence the opinions of public figures like Cloud, who appear to act as propaganda vehicles without questioning the information they receive.

The irony of the situation was not lost on many observers. Cloud, by using a free speech platform like X, which Musk owns, to attack Musk and call for him to return to Africa, seems oblivious to the inherent contradiction in his message. At the same time, this situation highlights how the left has used Musk as a scapegoat, attacking his political and business stance rather than addressing the real problems facing American citizens.

What stands out in this incident is the effectiveness of establishment propaganda. The criticism of Musk is not based on his actions or his policies, but on a smear campaign constructed by the media that labels him an enemy of progressivism. As with Donald Trump, the establishment and its allies in the media have cultivated a narrative that seeks to demonize Musk and those who challenge the established order.

Cloud’s stance also highlights the lack of understanding and adequate information in many sectors of society that have been swept up in this propaganda. Rather than question the policies and actions of politicians who are squandering the resources of the American people, Cloud chose to attack Musk, a man who has been a key figure in the fight to curb runaway government spending. This type of criticism reflects a dangerous pattern of misinformation and division, which only serves to increase political polarization and divert attention from more important issues.

Cloud’s case also adds to a series of recent incidents in which sports figures have been caught up in woke culture and have chosen to align themselves with narratives that seek to divide rather than unite. A recent example is that of Caitlin Clark, another WNBA star, who also caved to pressure from the woke movement, showing how sport and politics are becoming increasingly intertwined.

It is important to note that criticism of Musk is not an isolated phenomenon. Over the years, Musk has been attacked not only for his political views, but also for his technological innovations and business vision. However, the way the left has treated Musk is a manifestation of a broader campaign aimed at undermining those who challenge the status quo. Rather than trying to understand his proposals and actions, the media and political actors prefer to disqualify him and label him as an enemy of progress.

Finally, this incident highlights how politics and the media can significantly influence public opinion. Public figures, like Natasha Cloud, who buy into the establishment narrative end up being used as tools of a broader agenda that seeks to promote an ideological vision without considering the facts or realities of American politics.